As co-chairs of the Chaophraya Dialogue between opinion
makers from India and Pakistan, we are encouraged by reports of resumption of
the official dialogue between Islamabad and New Delhi, and of a possible
meeting between the two Prime Ministers on the sidelines of the U.N. General
Assembly this September.
We believe, however, that it is
also time for important gestures by the political leadership of the two
countries to inject fresh momentum into the fragile peace process. An early
visit to Pakistan by the Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, would be one
such gesture. While such a visit should not be burdened with the expectation of
a grand strategic bargain at this point, as many summits tend to be, it should
signal the need for genuine reconciliation. Dr. Singh’s visit to Islamabad should
then be followed by a summit between the two heads of government meeting in New
Delhi.
Both visits can be preceded or
followed by a meeting in Islamabad of the Indian External Affairs Minister with
his Pakistani counterpart. This would provide space for confidence-building
between the two countries and allow them to frame a working agenda for ongoing
talks on a calendar of unresolved and upcoming issues. There is a small window
of opportunity in bilateral relations — the leadership of the two countries must
seize this opening.
The power of democracy
India prides itself as the
world’s largest democracy, while the people of Pakistan recently affirmed their
thumping support for democracy in the face of terrorist threats. An elected
government has handed over power to a new one in Islamabad after a national
election. A resumption of official visits at this historic moment would signal
the triumph of democracy in the region.
Unlike in the past, there is
consensus among most major political parties in Pakistan on the need for
improving relations with India. The outgoing federal government in Islamabad
which leads the parliamentary opposition today, the Pakistan People’s Party
(PPP), is a strong proponent for talks. This gives Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif
opportune space to consult other political parties (including the PPP, the
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, the Awami National Party and the Muttahida Qaumi
Movement) to forge a national consensus on the need for reconciliation with
India, and the leadership of key parties in settling on a viable timeline of
confidence building measures. To build support for an ongoing dialogue that
pivots to peace, Dr. Singh must also lead an all-party leaders’ delegation to
Pakistan. The principal opposition party in India, the Bharatiya Janata Party
(BJP), will likely not oppose such a move. Some of the boldest initiatives
towards building peace in the region were supported by Atal Bihari Vajpayee
during his term as leader of the previous BJP-led coalition government.
Checking a drift
Indian concerns about the lack of
progress regarding the trial in Pakistan of the perpetrators of the 26/11
terrorist attacks in Mumbai mirror worries in Pakistan over the lack of
progress over several bilateral issues. Many issues seemed to have been agreed
upon, yet have defied closure. Clearly, the current strategic stalemate has
gone past its function of calming down post-crisis turbulence; instead, it has
begun to reinforce a dangerous drift away from the will and momentum needed for
peace.
The view that these issues should
not stand in the way of sustained dialogue is widely shared among Track II
interlocutors between India and Pakistan. In fact, last month, at the 12th
round of the Chaophraya Dialogue which brought together parliamentarians,
former government officials, generals, diplomats, academia and journalists from
both our countries, the joint view was to press for moving away from the
“pause” button and look for a new normal.
Moving forward
The menu for action forward on a
reset does not need any reinvention. The recommendations from this round of the
dialogue included the need to resume the back-channel dialogue on Kashmir;
active, not pro forma, revival of the ministerial level India-Pakistan joint
commission created in 1983, which should become a mandated official space for
old and new problems to be cleared, such as visa, travel and communication, and
the need for periodic dialogue between the two ministries of defence.
Leaps of faith have played a
great role in building peace throughout history. Conservative and risk-averse
bureaucracies have, however, systematically and deliberately underplayed the
importance of such exchanges. After nearly 66 years of bilateral conflict, the
resumption of dialogue at multiple levels, from the top to the joint secretary
level, could have a tremendous impact on a region bracing for multiple
transitions.
Islamabad has signalled more than
once its interest in taking visits and negotiations forward. New Delhi has
reciprocated but stopped short. It is time Dr. Singh moved away from the Cold
War straitjacket India-Pakistan relations have fallen into, and infused a new
sense of hope to the people of the subcontinent.
Survey
For real reconciliation between
the people of both countries, gestures are critically important. Indeed,
contrary to orthodox wisdom in India, unilateral overtures towards Pakistan
need not be a political liability. The recent India Poll conducted jointly by
the Australia India Institute and the Lowy Institute for International Policy
revealed that while an overwhelming majority of Indians identify Pakistan as a
threat, nearly 90 per cent agree that ordinary people in both countries want
peace, and a similar number believe that a real improvement in relations
requires courageous leadership in both countries. More important, nearly 80 per
cent felt India should take the initiative in seeking peace with Pakistan.
The findings suggested that if
Dr. Singh were to visit Pakistan and take the lead on a dialogue, he would have
popular support at home.
We believe that the time has come
for the political class in both countries to make important choices that will
spur peace for both India and Pakistan.
- Co-authored with Sherry Rehman
(Source: The Hindu)
No comments:
Post a Comment